Fault tolerant hardware/software architecture for flight critical function.
Read Online

Fault tolerant hardware/software architecture for flight critical function.

  • 85 Want to read
  • ·
  • 3 Currently reading

Published by Agard in Neuilly sur Seine .
Written in English

Book details:

Edition Notes

SeriesLecture series / Agard -- no.143
ContributionsAdvisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development. Guidance and Control Panel., Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development. Consultant and Exchange Programme.
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL14223314M

Download Fault tolerant hardware/software architecture for flight critical function.


as well as flight-critical data. Thus, if one or more GPCs in the redundant set GN&C functions during the critical phases of the mission, there is always a Conclusions: Hardware Design • Fault Tolerant Architectures. • Basics of hardware Size: 1MB. Within each channel, a hardware/software co-design architecture combines high fault-tolerance and time precision while maintaining flexibility. Time-critical low- level actuator controllers and acquisition of sensor measurement data are implemented in radiation-hard anti- fuse FPGAs (Microsemi RTAX) while high-level control,File Size: KB. up of many processors cores and hardware modules. In this fault-tolerant architecture, hardware-software co-design technology is used to exploit the fault-tolerant metric, which is a trade-off between software flexibility and hardware high-efficiency. The system architecture for multi-core SoC is shown in figure : Bingbing Xia, Fei Qiao, Huazhong Yang, Hui Wang. Hardware implemented fault tolerance design reduces operating system size, minimises systems software and increases processing speed, offering the end user the safest and simplest design. • Buy only what you need - wide range of configurable, fault tolerant, multi function I/O modules to suit most applications. Up to TMR I/O in each expander.

Page 3 (C) Daniel J. Sorin 5 Outline (of Introduction) • Motivation, goals, and challenges • Some examples of fault tolerant systems • Faults (C) Daniel J. Sorin 6 Motivation • Fault tolerance has always been around – NASA’s deep space probes – Medical computing devices (e.g., pacemakers) – But this had been a niche market until fairly recently. critical failure must be less than per flight hour. Traditionally [5], FCS has used a centralized /federated architecture where a specific fault tolerant. It would be very difficult to sum it up in one article since there are multiple ways to achieve fault tolerance in software. These principles deal with Desktop, Server applications and/or SOA. Also there are multiple methodologies, few of which we already follow without knowing; Exception handling for . Extending MIL-STDE into an Effective Software Safety Program 26 August architecture in terms of hardware, software, and human interfaces to the system. fault tolerance of a software function in context with its system behavior Provide the rationale forFile Size: KB.

technical assistance In fault tolerant software development for the Fault Tolerant Multlprocessor (FTMP). Thls report satlsfles Item of the subcontract. The FTMP is a highly reliable computer Intended to service reliability-critical applications In scheduled aircraft servlce. Work on the architecture File Size: 2MB. In NSCP/I/l, hardware- and software- fault-tolerance techniques are not inde- pendent, since the HECAs and the SECAs match. After a hardware component fails, the . FAULT TOLERANCE FOR DIGITAL SYSTEMS Herbert Hecht SoHaR Incorporated Redundancy is widely employed in safety critical computer applications, such as aircraft flight controls, in electronic communication systems, and in commercial environments b. Will the hardware and software necessary for the fault tolerance provisionsFile Size: KB. This is the work of fault-tolerant designers and their work is increasingly important and complex not only because of the increasing number of mission critical applications, but also because the diminishing reliability of hardware means that even systems for non-critical applications will need to be designed with fault-tolerance in mind.